<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gunleaders Blog &#187; admin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usrkba.org/blog/author/admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usrkba.org/blog</link>
	<description>Grass roots right to keep and bear arms advocacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 19:08:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DiGiacinto vs. the Rector and Visitors of George Mason University at VA Supreme Court today</title>
		<link>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/11/01/digiacinto-vs-the-rector-and-visitors-of-george-mason-university-at-va-supreme-court-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/11/01/digiacinto-vs-the-rector-and-visitors-of-george-mason-university-at-va-supreme-court-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrkba.org/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I heard the oral arguments of Rudolph DiGiacinto vs. GMU. This is a significant case on many fronts and has been brewing for some time. In fact our current Attorney General here in Virginia gained infamy with his candidate proclamation that he thought the GMU ban was indefensible and that he would tell them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/11/01/digiacinto-vs-the-rector-and-visitors-of-george-mason-university-at-va-supreme-court-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Postal Service sued over firearms ban</title>
		<link>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/30/us-postal-service-sued-over-firearms-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/30/us-postal-service-sued-over-firearms-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrkba.org/blog/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the same government agency who brought us the phrase &#8220;going postal&#8221; has a nebulous and kooky firearms ban. Here are some links: http://www.postalreporternews.net/2010/10/18/colorado-couple-challenge-usps-ban-of-firearms-on-postal-property/ http://onlygunsandmoney.blogspot.com/2010/10/challenge-to-ban-on-firearms-on-postal.html Here is the relevant code: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/julqtr/pdf/39cfr232.1.pdf Note: It covers &#8220;all real property&#8221; not just buildings. &#8220;(l) Weapons and explosives. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, rule or regulation, no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/30/us-postal-service-sued-over-firearms-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tasers, stun guns, mace, pepper gas, bear spray &amp; &#8220;Arms&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/19/tasers-stun-guns-mace-pepper-gas-bear-spray-arms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/19/tasers-stun-guns-mace-pepper-gas-bear-spray-arms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrkba.org/blog/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columbia, MO considering a ban on Tasers http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2010/10/14/personal-taser-ownership-could-become-second-amendment-issue/ An interesting and yet still overlooked aspect of the prohibitions the 2nd Amendment places on the federal, state &#038; local governments is the aspect of what &#8220;Arms&#8221; are protected besides guns. Knives? What about common &#8220;less lethal&#8221; implements? Certainly we think that the term &#8220;Arms&#8221; encompasses far [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/19/tasers-stun-guns-mace-pepper-gas-bear-spray-arms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No big surprise here &#8211; ATF trying to prevent firearms imports</title>
		<link>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/12/no-big-surprise-here-atf-trying-to-prevent-firearms-imports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/12/no-big-surprise-here-atf-trying-to-prevent-firearms-imports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 03:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrkba.org/blog/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hat tip to David Codrea http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/atf-surplus-korean-firearms-import-pose-a-threat-to-public-safety-the-u-s How much credibility should we give the same group who declared a shoestring to be a machine gun and reversed themselves years later It&#8217;s pretty clear here what the real threat to public safety in the US is (and it&#8217;s not the importation of 1911 pistols, M1 Garands or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usrkba.org/blog/2010/10/12/no-big-surprise-here-atf-trying-to-prevent-firearms-imports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
